Canada’s expected budget deficit is $50 billion and rising

June 15, 2009

Last week Prime Minister Stephen Harper revealed that Canada’s expected budget deficit is $50 billion and rising. That’s a lot of money. Especially compared to the deficit the Tories were predicting before the last election. Then, they said there wasn’t going to be a deficit.

Zero, $50 billion. Big difference.

But as CBC economics reporter Mike Hornbrook pointed out to me the other day, we may be making too much of that figure. Fifty billion dollars is without a doubt a big absolute number — but absolute numbers aren’t what matters.

It’s all about perspective: $200,000 is a lot for a car, cheap for a house and chicken feed compared to a banker’s bonus.

The point Mike wanted to make was that a country’s debt is relative. The correct way to look at deficits and total public debt is to measure them relative to a country’s total economic clout. For that we generally take total debt, which is a country’s deficit accumulated over the years, and compare it to gross domestic product or GDP.

The United States’ economy is huge, but so is its debt. Its debt-to-GDP ratio is about 97 per cent and most people expect it to head over 100 per cent.

Canada’s economy is a lot smaller, but our debt-to-GDP is hovering around 30 per cent. Compared to most large economies, that’s really not bad.

A country’s finances are very different from yours and mine. We can’t print money (at least, not without being put in jail), while Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney can. Lucky guy.

There are other differences too.

When you get a mortgage to buy a house, for instance, the bank gives you the lump sum today on the strength of your next 25 years of projected income. First-born not accepted as collateral.

The reason a lot of people don’t want the government to sink further into debt is that older Canadians have seen the effect.

A country borrows based on its future income too. Canada’s future income includes the taxes you will pay in your lifetime. But in the case of countries, the first-borns are included in the calculation. Not only that, but all the unborn future taxpayers as well. That’s because a country, unlike you, does not have a limited lifetime. That lets countries borrow against the stream of tax income far into the future. That’s a lot of borrowing.

Now the downside.

The reason a lot of people don’t want the government to sink further into debt is that older Canadians have seen the effect. Not long ago, when interest rates were higher and our public debt worse, interest payments on the public debt — the national mortgage payment, if you will — soaked up about 25 cents out of every dollar a person paid in taxes. When the economy weakened further, the government of the day was forced to spend. But with so much going in debt payments, the government had to borrow even more to spend.

Canada was like a subprime mortgage borrower.

Getting out of the spiral was a painful process. It involved lots of politically unpopular cuts and downloading. That’s why many people are fearful not of the absolute $50-billion deficit, but that it will grow and accumulate, sending us back into an upward spiral of debt.

A friend who works with me at the CBC recently proposed that this was a good time to take on debt because interest rates are so low.

That’s fine if the debt is short term, say for a new flat screen TV to watch the big game.

But if the loan is for the long term, like a mortgage or the national debt, it’s a different story. Unless we slip into deflation, which is looking less likely, borrowing could well be as cheap now as it will ever be in your lifetime. In other words, interest rates have nowhere to go but up.

In times like these, paying down a mortgage may be the best investment you can make.

First, stock markets are weird. They have had a nice run, but who knows when they will turn tail.

As we discussed on CBC News Business last week, fixed income alternatives aren’t much better. “High interest” savings accounts are paying about 1 per cent. Bonds pay more, but every time bond interest rates rise, the face value of existing bonds with lower rates plunges in value.

However, paying a little extra off your mortgage is an investment made in heaven. No matter what happens to the value of your home, the absolute amount you owe will still be on your books.

A lot of people forget that paying off a mortgage is exactly the same as investing the money in an interest-bearing, fixed-income security. With advantages.

In other words, paying off the debt is the same as getting bond interest on your money equal to your mortgage rate. Without any management or broker fees. No matter how good a rate you have, it is probably many times the current fixed income interest rate you could get. It is certainly better than what you will get at a high interest bank account.

The way to think about how much money you will make is to find one of those online mortgage calculators that show how much you shorten your mortgage when you make an extra payment. Every time you pay a little extra on your mortgage the amount of time you will be paying the mortgage shrinks. Every month it shrinks, that’s exactly the same as getting an increase in your disposable income equivalent to your monthly mortgage payment.

And here is the very best thing. The money you “get” (because you no longer have to pay the bank) will be tax free.

Sometimes a person, or a country, has things that require spending now. For a person, it’s clothes for the kids, little things like food and bus tickets. For a country it’s EI payments, bailouts, stimulus. It is okay to go a little into debt for the short term.

But whether a country or a person, paying down debt can pay off in the long term.

Moishe Alexander compares Canadian and U.S. deficit

Strategy for the Inclusion of Affordable Housing in New Residential Projects

May 7, 2009

In Montréal, Quebec, Moishe Alexander CEO of Canadian Funding Corporation reports that the CMHC found that the construction of affordable housing has become an important issue for many North American cities.While cities such as Boston and Vancouver have adopted a regulatory approach, Montréal’s administration has developed a voluntary, incentive-based strategy, and it seems that this approach is paying off.

Adopted in August 2005, the Strategy for the Inclusion of Affordable Housing in New Residential Projects aims to encourage the development of a wide variety of housing options on large sites, facilitate the creation of social and community housing and, lastly, stimulate the production of affordable ownership dwellings.

In the Strategy, the City sets out its key arguments to promote the construction of affordable housing:

Address social issues;
Slow the exodus of young households;
Contribute to economic vitality.

The Affordable Housing Solution

Montréal’s Strategy is one of the initiatives taken to achieve one objective of the City’s Master Plan— that 30 per cent of all homes built be affordable. More specifically, the Strategy aims to ensure that: 15 per cent of the new housing units built in Montréal be social and community housing units, partly funded by government programs; and 15 per cent of the new housing units be affordable rental or ownership housing units built by the private sector.

There is also a specific objective of developing large sites (with a construction potential exceeding 200 units), particularly on municipal, public or semi-public lands. For other projects requiring major regulatory changes, the City wants at least 30 per cent of the units as affordable housing.

It is at this level that a social mix is negotiated—a balance between community housing units, affordably priced properties and market-priced properties. Developers may then offerto not only deliver affordable private housing but also transfer a portion of their lands under favourable conditions for the development of social housing. In some cases, developers may go as far as offering to develop social housing as turnkey projects within the parameters of government programs.

Commercial Property Financed With 95% LTV After Moishe Alexander Approval

February 10, 2009

Winston James of Crombie Street, Cambridge, Ontario required a first mortgage on a commercial property in Cambridge with a loan to value of 95%. Canadian Funding Corporation approved the deal after Moishe Alexander approved the application. Canadian Funding Corp and one of its co-lenders united funding resources to cover the transaction and Michael Spiro closed the deal as the presiding project attorney.

Moishe Alexander Funds $400,000 Mortgage for Struggling Entrepreneur

February 10, 2009

Mr. Tariq originally applied for a first mortgage on Darnell St. in Guelph. Moishe Alexander of Canadian Funding Corporation approved this $400,000.00 first mortgage, along with a collateral mortgage on Bagot Street.

Canadian Funding Corp along with a co-lender, funded the deal and company attorney Michael Spiro closed the deal

Moishe Alexander Approves Darnell Loan

February 10, 2009

John Darnell of Morton Street, Toronto required an 81% loan to value second mortgage to pay existing arrears on the first mortgage and three-year John Darnell of Morton Street, Toronto Moishe Alexander approved this second mortgage of $23,500.00 and Canadian Funding Corp funded the deal with attorney Michael Spiro closing the deal.

Sudbury Borrower Recieves Moishe Alexander’s Support

February 10, 2009

Moishe Alexander and Canadian Funding Corporation provide 92% LTV for Sudbury commercial mortgage

A borrower from Sudbury required a third mortgage on a commercial property located at Bancroft Drive, Sudbury, with a loan to value of 92% to purchase the property. Moishe Alexander approved the commercial purchase. An estate, controlled by Canadian Funding Corp, funded the deal, and corporate attorney Barry J. Poulson closed the deal.

Moishe Alexander Approves Funding that Allows Unemployed Woman to Keep Home

February 6, 2009

Mrs. Huggett of Brampton, Ontario required a first mortgage of $234,000.00, but was unemployed and the banks declined her finance requests. Moishe Alexander approved the loan, which represented 65% of the property value, and Canadian Funding Corp funded the deal.

Moishe Alexander Funds Second Mortgage for James Martin

February 6, 2009

Mr. James Martin of Strouds Lane, Pickering Ontario made an application for a second mortgage of $25,000.00 representing 96.30% of the value of the property. Canadian Funding Corporation, after receiving approval from President Moishe Alexander, funded the deal.

Moishe Alexander Approves Callaghan’s Second Mortgage at 86% LTV

February 4, 2009

Mr. and Mrs. Callaghan of Boswell Dr, Bowmanville, Ontario applied again to Canadian Funding Corporation for a second mortgage which covered 86% of the loan to value to pay credit card debts, and avoid a consumer proposal. Moishe Alexander of Canadian Funding Corporation approved the deal directing Canadian Funding Corp and it’s co-lenders to fund the deal.

Moishe Alexander helps couple pay off Citi Financial debt

February 4, 2009

Mr. and Mrs. Castro of Pilot St, in Toronto, Ontario Canada applied for a second mortgage to pay off an existing second mortgage with Citi Financial, and to pay their debts to avoid bankruptcy. Canadian Funding Corporation and Moishe Alexander approved this second mortgage, for which the total loan to value was 83.4%. Moishe Alexander spearheaded the initial financing approval requests.

spearheaded the initial financing approval requests.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.